David Chalmers (NYU & ANU): The Externalist and the Structuralist Responses to Skepticism

I will discuss two ways of responding to Cartesian arguments for global skepticism about the external world.  In an earlier paper ("The Matrix as Metaphysics") I argued that Cartesian hypotheses such as the evil demon hypothesis, the brain-in-a-vat hypothesis, and the Matrix hypothesis are not in fact skeptical hypotheses: if these hypotheses are correct, most of our ordinary beliefs are still true.  This response is often assimilated to Hilary Putnam's appeal to semantic externalism to defuse external-world skepticism, whereby brains in vats are held to refer to whatever causes their experiences.  I will argue that Putnam's externalist response fails because it requires an implausible global externalism.  I will argue instead for a response to skepticism driven by an underlying structuralism (akin to structural realism in the philosophy of science).  On this line, Cartesian hypotheses are non-skeptical hypotheses because they share the structure of our ordinary hypotheses about the external world.

Date & time

Tue 11 Jul 2017, 3:30pm to 5:30pm


SRWB Theatrette (Room 2.02)

Event series


Updated:  11 July 2017/Responsible Officer:  Head of School/Page Contact:  CASS Marketing & Communications