Skip to main content

School of Philosophy

  • Home
  • People
  • Events
    • Event series
    • Conferences
      • Past conferences
    • Past events
  • News
    • Audio/Video Recordings
  • Research
  • Study with us
    • Prizes and scholarships
  • Visit us
  • Contact us

Centres & Projects

  • Centre for Consciousness
  • Centre for Moral, Social and Political Theory
  • Centre for Philosophy of the Sciences
  • Humanising Machine Intelligence

Related Sites

  • Research School of Social Sciences
  • ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences

Centre for Consciousness

Related Sites

Centre for Moral, Social and Political Theory

Centre for Philosophy of the Sciences

School of Philosophy

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomeUpcoming EventsEmily C. Parke (Auckland): What Are Biosignatures Signatures Of?
Emily C. Parke (Auckland): What are biosignatures signatures of?

NASA has spent decades, and billions of dollars, looking for life in our solar system. Just this month they issued a major press release announcing that they have found organic matter on Mars. It is far from clear whether they have found life, however. This is partly because what they found is a molecular ‘sign’ of life, rather than potential life forms. But it is also because there is no agreed-upon understanding of what counts as life in the first place. Here we run into an unresolved debate that goes back at least 2000 years: What is life? Today this debate has arrived at an impasse, with over 100 proposed definitions of life and little movement towards consensus within disciplines, let alone across them. This has led some philosophers and scientists to dismiss the whole project of defining life as misguided or hopeless, and to suggest that we give up and find something else to argue about.

But we cannot give up so easily. Astrobiologists rely on assumptions about what life is when they search for life in the solar system, regardless of whether or not these are explicitly articulated or argued for. I discuss several cases where this is especially evident, such as the recent Mars finding and more generally the project of searching the universe for ‘biosignatures’. One central sticking point in this debate is that most parties have assumed that the aim is to converge on a single, unanimous definition of life. I suggest there is a middle ground between converging on a single definition and giving up, which involves accounting for the multifaceted roles that the notion of life plays in scientific practice.

Date & time

  • Thu 21 Jun 2018, 3:30 pm - 3:30 pm

Location

Coombs Seminar Room A

Event Series

Philosophy Departmental Seminars

Contact

  •  Send email