The Choice Argument for Proportional Representation - Adam Lovett

The Choice Argument for Proportional Representation - Adam Lovett
Image by Dina (Adobe Stock)

What electoral system should a democracy choose? I argue for proportional representation (PR). My main empirical premise is Duverger’s law: under PR there are more viable candidates in district-level elections than there are under single-member plurality (SMP) systems. This matters normatively because autonomy is a core part of democracy's value. Democracy enables voters to author their social and political affairs. But how much one enjoys autonomous authorship of anything is constrained by the diversity of one's adequate options. The fewer adequate options one can choose between, the less will one's choice contribute to one’s autonomy. So PR augments voter autonomy by increasing the diversity of adequate options they have at election time. This argument supports a pure PR system with a single nationwide district, nolegal thresholds for legislative representation, in which voters can vote for candidates rather than just for party lists.

Date & time

Thu 26 Sep 2024, 3:30pm to 5:00pm

Location

Level 1 Auditorium (1.28), RSSS Building 146 Ellery Cres. Acton 2601, ACT

Speakers

Dr Adam Lovett (Australian Catholic University)

Contacts

Michael Barnes

SHARE

Updated:  13 September 2024/Responsible Officer:  Head of School/Page Contact:  CASS Marketing & Communications