In this talk I introduce three important fault lines in moral theory. They are respectively the relative/neutral fault line, the normative priority fault line, and the value-maximizing/non-maximizing fault line. Each of these fault lines is logically independent of the others, and each reflects a different area of concern in moral theory. Thus, moral theories can be categorized by the stance they take with respect to each of these fault lines. I then look at some common views about the nature of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics and show how they are incompatible with the picture I develop. As a result, I argue we need to revise our understanding of these moral theories and recognize that there are more options available in moral theorizing.